A17643:197
Commentary upon the Epistle to the Romans
A commentary upon the Epistle of Saint Paul to the Romans, written in Latin by M. John Calvin, and newly translated into English by Christopher Rosdell preacher. Whereunto is added a necessary table for the better and more ready finding out of certain principal matters contained in this workA commentarie vpon the Epistle of Saint Paul to the Romanes, written in Latine by M. Iohn Caluin, and newely translated into Englishe by Christopher Rosdell preacher. Whereunto is added a necessarie table for the better and more readie finding out of certayne principall matters conteyned in this worke
London: printed by Thomas Dawson for John Harison and George Bishop, 1583London: printed by Thomas Dawson for Iohn Harison and George Bishop, 1583
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
22 Thou which abhorrest idols. Very aptly he opposeth sacrilege to idolatry, as a thing of the same kind. For sacrilege,1 simply is a profanation of the divine majesty. Which sin was not unknown unto the heathen Poets. For this cause Ovid chargeth Lycurgus with sacrilege,2 For contemning the solemn feasts of Bacchus: and in Fastis, he calleth those Sacrilegas manus, id est, Wicked handes which violated the majesty of Venus. But seeing the Gentiles gave the majesty of their gods unto idols, they counted that only for sacrilege, if any did steal that was dedicated to their Temples, wherein they thought all religion consisted. So at this day where superstition reigneth in stead of the word of God, they acknowledge no other sacrilege, then the stealing of the riches of temples: because with them there is no God but in idols, no religion but in riot, and pomp. And here we are admonished, first, that we flatter not our selves, when we have observed some part of the Law, and contemn the residue.
22 Thou which abhorrest idols. Verie aptely he opposeth sacriledge to idolatrie, as a thing of the same kinde. For sacriledge,1 simply is a prophanation of the diuine maiestie. Which sinne was not vnknowen vnto the heathen Poets. For this cause Ouide chargeth Lycurgus with sacrilege,2 For contemning the solemne feastes of Bacchus: and in Fastis, he calleth those Sacrilegas manus, id est, Wicked handes which violated the maiestie of Venus. But seeing the Gentises gaue the maiestie of their gods vnto idols, they counted that onely for sacrilege, if any did steale that was dedicated to their Temples, wherein they thought all religion consisted. So at this daye where superstition raigneth in steade of the woorde of God, they acknowledge no other sacrilege, then the stealing of the riches of temples: because with them there is no God but in idols, no religion but in riot, and pompe. And here wee are admonished, first, that we flatter not our selues, when wee haue obserued some part of the Lawe, and contemne the residewe.
- 1