A17643:529
Commentary upon the Epistle to the Romans
A commentary upon the Epistle of Saint Paul to the Romans, written in Latin by M. John Calvin, and newly translated into English by Christopher Rosdell preacher. Whereunto is added a necessary table for the better and more ready finding out of certain principal matters contained in this workA commentarie vpon the Epistle of Saint Paul to the Romanes, written in Latine by M. Iohn Caluin, and newely translated into Englishe by Christopher Rosdell preacher. Whereunto is added a necessarie table for the better and more readie finding out of certayne principall matters conteyned in this worke
London: printed by Thomas Dawson for John Harison and George Bishop, 1583London: printed by Thomas Dawson for Iohn Harison and George Bishop, 1583
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Therefore denieth he him self to do that which the law commandeth, because he doeth it not absolutely, but in a manner fainteth in his endeavour.
Therefore denieth hee him selfe to doe that which the lawe commaundeth, because hee doeth it not absolutely, but in a maner fainteth in his indeuoure.
For what I would do. You may not understand this to have bin alway in him, as though he could never do any good: but only he complaineth that he could not do that he coveted: namely that he could not prosecute that was good, with such alacrity as was meet, because he was holden in a manner bond: again, that he fainted in that wherein he would not, because he ⟨p. 89⟩was feeble through the infirmity of the flesh. The godly mind therefore doeth not that good it would,1 because it standeth not with courage as were meet: and it doth the evil it would not, because it desireth to stand, and falleth, or at the least shaketh.
For what I woulde doe. You maye not vnderstand this to haue bin alway in him, as though he coulde neuer do any good: but onely he complayneth that he could not doe that he coueted: namely that he coulde not prosecute that was good, with such alacritie as was meete, because hee was holden in a maner bond: againe, that he fainted in that wherein he would not, because hee ⟨p. 89⟩was feeble through the infirmitie of the fleshe. The godly minde therefore doeth not that good it woulde,1 because it standeth not with courage as were meete: and it doth the euill it would not, because it desireth to stande, and falleth, or at the least shaketh.
- 1