A18078:543
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
printed by John Stroud?, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But first I desire M. Doctor to set down but one / and then I will leave it to thy consideration (gentle reader) to think / whether M. Doctor hath red any learned or godly mans exposition to be such / when he hath not red those which are nearest him / I mean our own country men. I say he hath not red them / because I would think charitably so of him / rather then that he should have red them / and yet speak untruly of them / and father those things of them / which they never speak.
But first I desire M. Doctor to set downe but one / and then I will leaue it to thy consyderation (gentle reader) to thincke / whether M. Doctor hath red any learned or godly mans exposition to be suche / when he hath not red those which are nearest hym / I meane our owne countrey men. I say he hath not red them / because I woulde thinke charitably so of hym / rather then that he shoulde haue red them / and yet speake vntruely of them / and father those things of them / which they neuer speake.
M. Jewell the bishop of Salisbury expounded this place / and yet did never 1expound it / of the office and authority of an archbishop of all the bishops / and clergy of the province / but clean contrariwise applieth it to the authority that every bishop had in his diocese / his words are these: Now therefore to draw that thing by violence to one only bishop / that is generally spoken of all bishops / is a guileful fetch to mislead the reader / and no simple nor plain dealing. Here you see that M. Ivel doth not understand this of any archbishop / but of every bishop.
M. Iewell the byshop of Sarisburie expounded thys place / and yet dyd neuer 1expounde it / of the office and authoritie of an archbyshop of all the byshops / and clergie of the prouince / but cleane contrarywise applyeth it to the authoritie that euery byshop had in hys diocesse / hys wordes are these: Now therefore to draw that thing by violence to one only byshop / that is generally spoken of all byshops / is a guilefull fetch to misseleade the reader / and no simple nor playne dealing. Heere you see that M. Iuel doth not vnderstande thys of any archbyshop / but of euery byshop.