A18078:560
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
printed by John Stroud?, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
If therefore superiority & domination of one above the rest / have such force to keep men from schisms / when they be in the truth / it hath as great force to keep them together in error / and so besides that one is easier to be corrupted then many / this power of one bringeth as great incommodity in keeping them in error if they fall into it / as in the truth if they are in it. Moreover / if it be necessary for the keeping of unity in the church of England / that one archbishop should be primate over all / why is it not as meet / that for the keeping of the whole universal church / there should be one archbishop / or bishop over all / and the like necessity of the bishop over all christendom / as of the bishop of all England / unless peradventure it be more necessary / that there should be one bishop over the universal church / then over the church of England / for as much as it is more necessary that peace should be kept / and schisms be avoided in the universally church / then in the particular church of England.
If therfore superiority & domination of one aboue the rest / haue such force to keepe men from schismes / when they be in the truth / it hath as great force to kepe them togither in error / and so besides that one is easier to be corrupted then many / thys power of one bringeth as great incommodity in keping them in error if they fall into it / as in the truth if they are in it. Moreouer / if it be necessary for the keping of vnity in the church of England / that one archbyshop should be primate ouer all / why is it not as meete / that for the keping of the whole vniuersall church / there should be one archbyshop / or byshop ouer all / and the like necessity of the byshop ouer all christendome / as of the byshop of all England / vnles peraduenture it be more necessary / that there should be one byshop ouer the vniuersall church / then ouer the church of England / for as much as it is more necessary that peace should be kept / and schismes be auoyded in the vniuersali church / then in the particulare church of England.
If you say that the archbishop of England / hath his authority granted of the Prince / the Pope of Rome will say that Constantine or Phocas / which was Emperor of all christendom / did grant him his authority over all churches. But you will say that it is a lie / but the Pope will set as good a face / and make as great a show therein / as you do in divers points here. But admit it to be a lie (as in deed it is touching Constantine) yet I say further / that it may come to pass / & it hath ben / that there may be one Christian Cesar over all the realms which have churches. What if he then will give that authority to one over all / that one king granteth in his land / may any man accept and take at his hand such authority? and if it be not lawful for him to take that authority / tell me what fault you can find in him / which may not be found in them?