A18078:581
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
printed by John Stroud?, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
M. Doctor reasoneth again / that Paul an Apostle / and in the highest degree of ministry / was superior to Timothy and Titus Evangelists / and so in a lower degree of ministry / therefore one minister is superior to an other / ⟨p. 112⟩one bishop to an other bishop / which are all one office / and one function. As if I should say my Lord Mayor of London is above the sheriffs / therefore one sherif is superior to an other. Again / an other argument he hath of the same strength. Titus being an Evangelist / was superior to all the pastors in Crete / which was a degree under the Evangelists / therefore one pastor must be superior unto an other pastor. And that he was superior / he proveth because he had authority to ordain pastors / so that the print of the archbishop is so deeply set in his head / that hereof he can imagine nothing / but that Titus should be archbishop of all Crete.
M. Doctor reasoneth agayne / that Paule an Apostle / and in the highest degree of ministerie / was superior to Timothe and Titus Euangelistes / and so in a lower degree of mynisterie / therefore one mynister is superior to an other / ⟨p. 112⟩one byshop to an other byshop / whych are all one office / and one function. As if I shuld say my Lord Mayor of London is aboue the sherifes / therfore one sherife is superior to an other. Again / an other argumēt he hath of the same strēgth. Titus being an Euangelist / was superior to al the pastors in Crete / which was a degree vnder the Euangelists / therfore one pastor must be superior vnto an other pastor. And that he was superior / he proueth because he had authority to ordaine pastors / so that the print of the archbyshop is so deepely set in his head / that hereof he can imagine nothing / but that Titus shuld be archbishop of all Crete.
I have showed before / how these words are to be taken of S. Paul: and for so much as M. Doctor burdeneth us with the authority of Calvin so often / I will send him to Calvins own interpretation upon this place / where he showeth ye Titus did not ordain by his own authority / for s. Paul would not grant Titus leave to do that / which he him self would not / and showeth that to say that Titus should make the election of pastors by him self / is to give unto him a princely authority / and to take away the election from the church / and the judgement of the insufficiency of the minister from the company of the pastors / which were (sayeth he) to profane the whole government of the church.