A18078:660
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
printed by John Stroud?, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now if I would say the one is as impossible as the other / & for proof thereof allege that which the Philosophers say / that as there are no degrees in that which is infinite / so that of things which are infinite / one thing can not be more infinite then an other / so there are no degrees in impossibility / that of things which are impossible / one thing should be more impossible then an other: If I should thus reason / I think I should put you to some pain. But I will not draw the reader to such thorny and subtle questions / it is enough for us / that the one and the other be impossible / although one should be more impossible then the other. And that it is impossible for one man to be bishop over a whole province / or over a whole diocese / I leave it to be considered of that which is before said in the description of the office of a bishop / pastor / or minister / where I speak of the necessity of the residence of the bishop in his church.
Now if I wold say the one is as impossible as the other / & for proofe thereof alleage that which the Philosophers say / that as there are no degrees in that which is infinite / so that of thinges which are infinite / one thing can not be more infinite then an other / so there are no degrees in impossibilitie / that of thinges which are impossible / one thyng shoulde bee more impossible then an other: If I shoulde thus reason / I thincke I shoulde putte you to some payne. But I will not draw the reader to suche thorney and subtile questyons / it is enough for vs / that the one and the other be impossible / although one shoulde bee more impossible then the other. And that it is impossible for one man to bee byshoppe ouer a whole prouince / or ouer a whole dyocese / I leaue it to bee considered of that which is before sayde in the discription of the office of a byshoppe / pastor / or minister / where I speake of the necessitie of the residence of the byshop in hys church.
As a Prince may rule a whole realm / such as France / or England / so may he rule the whole world by officers and magistrates appointed underneath him: And there have been divers Princes / which have had as many lands under their power / as the Pope hath had churches / and although it be somewhat inconvenient / yet I know not why they might not so have / coming lawfully by them. Now I would gladly hear whether you would say the same of a bishop / and if you dare not / then why do you bring the similitude of the government of a Prince over a land / to prove that an archbishop may be over a whole province. M. Doctor dare boldly say / that there may be one bishop over a whole province / but he dare not say that there may be a bishop over the whole Church. But what better warrant for the one / then for the other? Again / if the whole church be in one province or in one realm / which hath been / and is not impossible to be again / if there may be now one bishop over a realm or province / then there may be one bishop over all the church / so that in travailing with an archbishop / he hath brought forth a Pope.