A18078:67
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
printed by John Stroud?, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
In the. 240. page he reasoneth thus / that the surplice. &c. be notes / and notes of good ministers / therefore they be good notes of ministers / which is a fallacy of composition / when a man thinketh that whatsoever is said of a thing by it self / may be said of it when it is joined with an other.
In the. 240. page he reasoneth thus / that the surplice. &c. be notes / and notes of good ministers / therefore they be good notes of ministers / which is a fallacion of compositiō / when a man thinketh that whatsoeuer is sayd of a thing by it selfe / may be sayd of it when it is ioyned with an other.
In the. 149. page he reasoneth thus / those which authorised the book of Common prayer / were studious of peace / & building the church / therefore those which find fault with it / are pullers down of the church / and disturbers of the peace / which is a fallacy of the Accident, when a man thinketh that every thing which is verified of the Subject, may be likewise verified of that which is annexed unto it. The further confutation of which arguments I refer unto their places.
In the. 149. page he reasoneth thus / those which authorised the booke of Common prayer / were studious of peace / & building the churche / therefore those which finde fault with it / are pullers downe of the church / and disturbers of the peace / which is a fallacion of the Accident, when a man thinketh that euery thing which is verified of the Subiect, may be likewise verefied of that which is annexed vnto it. The further confutation of which arguments I refer vnto their places.
There be divers other which he hath / which are so far from just conclusions / as they have not so much as any colour of likelihood of argument / which I can not tell where to lodge / unless I put them in the common Inn / which is that / which is called the ignorance of the Elench. as in the. 69. page / when he concludeth thus / that Cyprian speaketh not of the bishop of Rome / ergo he speaketh of an archbishop.