A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…

I have showed before that they may not baptise at all / therefore not in private houses: besides that that I have in the Reply unto the section in the one and twenty page showed / how it is not lawful neither to preach the word / nor to minister the Sacraments in private corners / for the which matter of not ministering the Sacraments in private houses / to the authors of the Admonition / citing the eleventh Chapter of the first Epistle unto the Corinthians / M. Doctor answereth that he reproveth the profanation of the supper by banqueting and contempt of their brethren / and exhorteth to tarry one for an other.

I haue shewed before that they may not baptise at all / therefore not in priuate houses: besides that that I haue in the Reply vnto the section in the one and twenty page shewed / how it is not lawfull neyther to preach the word / nor to minister the Sacramentes in priuate corners / for the which matter of not ministring the Sacramentes in priuate houses / to the authors of the Admonition / citing the eleuenth Chapter of the first Epistle vnto the Corrinthians / M. Doctor answeareth that he reproueth the prophanation of the supper by banketting and contempt of their brethren / and exhorteth to tary one for an other.

But what is this to the purpose? we ask not M. Doctor the interpretation of this place / as we do not of all the rest which he interpreteth / where there is no occasion in the world to interpret them / being of them selves very clear / and the interpretation which is brought never almost making ▪ any thing for the solution of that which is objected / which I desire the Reader to mark throughout his whole book. For what if S. Paul reprove the profanation of the supper of the Lord / doth it follow therefore that he doth not give to understand / that the Sacrament should be administered in a common assembly? What if he exhort to tarry one for an other / therefore doth he not dehort from celebrating of the sacrament in a private house?

But what is thys to the purpose? we aske not M. Doctor the interpretation of thys place / as we doe not of all the rest which he interpreateth / where there is no occasyon in the world to interpreate them / being of them selues very cleare / and the interpretation which is brought neuer almost making any thing for the solution of that which is obiected / which I desire the Reader to marke throughout hys whole booke. For what if S. Paule reproue the prophanation of the supper of the Lord / doth it follow therefore that he doth not geue to vnderstand / that the Sacrament should be administred in a common assembly? What if hee exhorte to tary one for an other / therefore dothe he not dehorte from celebrating of the sacrament in a priuate house?