A18078:723
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
printed by John Stroud?, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now I return to the example of Sephora / and say that the unlawfulness of that fact doth appear sufficiently in that she did it / before her husband Moses / which was a Prophet of the Lord / and to whom that office of circumcision did appertain: so that unless M. Doctor would have midwives baptise in the presence of the bishop or the minister / there is no cause why he should allege this place. Besides that she did cut of that foreskin of the infant not of mind to obey the commandment of God / or for the salvation of the child / but in a choler only / to the end that her husband might be eased and have release: which mind appeareth in her / both by her words / and by casting away in anger the foreskin which she had cut of. And if it be said that the event declared that the act pleased God / because that Moses forthwith waxed better / and was recovered of his sickness / I have showed before / how if we measure things by the event / we shall oftentimes justify the wicked / and take the righteousness of the righteous from them. An other reason he hath / which is / that the dignity of the sacraments doth not depend upon the man / whether he be minister or no minister / good or evil.
Now I returne to the example of Sephora / and say that the vnlawfulnes of that fact doth appeare suffyciently in that shee dyd it / before her husband Moses / which was a Prophet of the Lord / and to whome that office of circumcysion dyd appertayne: so that vnlesse M. Doctor would haue mydwyues baptise in the presence of the byshop or the mynister / there is no cause why he should alledge thys place. Besides that shee dyd cutte of that foreskin of the infant not of mynde to obey the commaundement of God / or for the saluation of the childe / but in a choler only / to the ende that her husbande myght be eased and haue release: which mynde appeareth in her / both by her wordes / and by casting away in anger the forskin which she had cutte of. And if it be sayde that the euent declared that the act pleased God / because that Moses forthwith waxed better / and was recouered of hys sicknesse / I haue shewed before / how if we measure thinges by the euent / we shall oftentymes iustifie the wicked / and take the righteousnesse of the righteous from them. An other reason he hath / which is / that the dignitie of the sacramentes doth not depende vpon the man / whether he be mynister or no mynister / good or euill.