A18080:1097
The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright
The second reply of Thomas Cartwright: against Master Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Church disciplineThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright: agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Churche discipline
Heidelberg: printed by Michael Schirat, 1575
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Answ. (as his custom is) taketh his pleasure off me / 1because upon the words off Jerome (this custom was at Alexandria) I gather that it was not in other places. As if it were not manifest that Jerome noteth where it began: and if it had beginning at Alexandria / it was there when it was not in other churches. If it had had further passage at that time; Jerome should ⟨p. DLXXXIX⟩have done it injury in concealing it. For it would have made much for the credit off that distinction. Which I alleging in the next divis. the Ans. saith nothing unto. Nether is there any so rude an idiot / which knoweth not that a notable / or unwonted thing said off one man / place / or time / is spoken emphatically / and excludeth all other. But as the D. will not understand a general proposition / unless it have the sign (all, or every) before it: so he will not understand that any thing is appropriate unto another / unless it have thes words only, alone, &c. And it is clear how intolerable the D. is in his insultations / seeing Jerome in saying that this custom gat ground by little, 2and little, declareth the truth of my collection. And where he answereth to that I objected off the confounding oftentimes off priest / and bishop / that the bishop is a priest, but not contrariwise: he first answereth not to the argument. For this is not to be confounded / when off two things one is verified of the other / but the other can not return / and be verified of his fellow. Secondly / his answer is overthrown by his exposition of the place of Cyprian / which by one priest in the church, understandeth one only bishop in a church. for thereby it followeth / that ether there was but only one priest in the church of Carthage: or else thes words bishop and priest, were all one: so that whosoever was one / was the other. The next division hath not a word to purpose. for authorities are quoted / to prove that the Apostles appointed Bishops in divers churches / which no man denieth: yea I have namely alleged it before
The Answ. (as his coustome is) taketh his pleasure off me / 1because vpon the wordes off Ierome (this coustome vvas at Alexandria) I gather that yt was not in other places. As if yt were not manifeste that Ierome noteth where yt began: and if it had beginning at Alexandria / yt was there when yt was not in other churches. If it had had further passage at that time; Ierome should