The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright

And (to enter yet further into this matter) Where he saith / that the argument is nothing worth, which is drawn of the fact of the Apostle: by the same reason he also condemneth / arguments brought of the facts of our Saviour Christ / and much more / of all other holy men / and Prophets. Whereof the scripture is full / as when our Sau. Christ / proveth that it was lawful in some case to break the corporal rest of the Sabbath / by the example off Davids ¹eating of the show bread. As when he excused him self / that he did not work his miracles in Nazareth / where he was nourished up / rather then in Capernaum and other places: by the examples off Elijah / and Elisha / by which he taught that a man may attempt nothing without a vocation. all these arguments if M. D. had had the answering of them: he would as it seemeth / have said unto our saviour Christ / that they are nothing worth.

And (to enter yet further into this matter) Where he saithe / that the argument is nothing worth, which is drawen of the facte of the Apostle: by the same reason he also condemneth / argumentes browght of the factes of our Sauiour Christ / and muche more / of all other holie men / and Prophetes. Wherof the scripture is full / as when our Sau. Christ / proueth that it was lawfull in some case to breake the corporall reste of the Sabothe / by the example off Dauids ¹eating of the shew bread. As when he excused him selfe / that he did not worke his miracles in Nazareth / where he was nourished vp / rather then in Capernaum and other places: by the examples off Elias / and Elizeus / by which he tawght that a man may attempte nothing without a vocation. all these argumentes if M. D. had had the answeringe of them: he would as it semeth / haue said vnto our sauiour Christ / that they are nothing worth.

1. 1Marc. 2. 26. 4. Luk. 25. 26. 27,