The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright

The first / and second diu. be not worth the answer / the third is answered / except that he saith / the Adm. proved not the sufficiency off the scripture by 1. Cor 1. 18. 1. Ro. 16. because there be manifest places for that purpose: as though it were thus to be charged / if it used places ⟨p. CCCXCIII⟩which prove that / although not the fittest. Where upon that the Lord admitteth no instruments be they never so vile, in the ¹service of the temple, nor trumpets in assembling the people, but which were sanctified to that use, although others were as apt to do the work as they, I concluded that homilies, &c. not sanctified of the Lord to that purpose, ought to be kept out: he answereth / that similitudes be no sufficient proof, and that the Lord did not command that nothing should be red in the church but canonical scripture, not remembering that it is the holy ghosts / which teacheth that the tabernacle with the vessels / were made according to the patron off the church now. The which in the holy trumpets is ²more clearly seen: considering that the holy ghost commanding them to be blown by the priests alone / and comparing the public ³teaching with the sound off them: doth not obscurely declare / that they were shadows thereof. Therefore as the trumpet• were sanctified to the temple / by the commandment off God: so to make Homilies holy in Gods principal / and public service / the like authority is required.

The first / and second diu. be not worth the answer / the third is answered / except that he saith / the Adm. proued not the sufficiency off the scripture by 1. Cor 1. 18. 1. Ro. 16. becawse there be manifest places for that pourpose: as though it were thus to be charged / if it vsed places ⟨p. CCCXCIII⟩which proue that / although not the fittest. Where vppon that the Lord admitteth no instrumētes be they neuer so vile, in the ¹