A18080:904
The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright
The second reply of Thomas Cartwright: against Master Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Church disciplineThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright: agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Churche discipline
Heidelberg: printed by Michael Schirat, 1575
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This is no answer unto my reason. For if the church without 1the Archbishop / and Archdeacon / be a body consisting of all the parts / comely knit together / wherein nothing wanteth / nor nothing is to much: then it followeth / that thes offices bring nether ornament / nor accomplishment to the church / but make only an unprofitable knob / and lump off flesh / to the both disfiguring / and hinderance off the growth off the body. And the ministry off order / and policy of the church / being one part off this body: if it be not whole / and complete / but need to be pieced out with archbishops / and Archdeacons: it must draw with it this absurdity / that there being one member unperfect without them / the body also off Christ is not perfect. And where it is said / that as in the Apostles times the church was not perfect without them, and Prophets, &c. so it is not now, meaning thereby (as both before / and after hath appeared) that the archbishops should supply the room off the Apostles: I answer that the Argument holdeth not. For considering that the perfection off the body / must be measured by the will off him whose the body is / that is Christ: as when he gave Apostles / Evangelists / &c. he made it appear that he would not have his body perfect without them: so when he took them away from his church / he made it known that the body was perfect without them. If Apostles / and Evangelists had been put down by authority of man: then it might have helped you / that as men put down Ministries / so they might supply them with other. But seeing they were taken away by the Lord: this your reason in effect (because God taketh away, therefore men may administeries) hath no strength in it. And where all this drift is / that you would have the archbishop's office come in for the Apostles / and therefore say that their authority over the pastors doth, and must remain in such places, as there be churches: besides my former answer unto this point / you are again taken in the words off ⟨p. CCCCLX⟩your own lips. For if it must remain: then the office off the archbishop which you make the vessel to receive this authority in / and whose office (you say) consisteth in the rule off other pastors, is not variable / and depending off circumstance off time / &c. but perpetual / and constant.
This is no answer vnto my reason. For if the church withowt