The rest of the second reply of Thomas Cartvurihgt [sic]The rest of the second replie of Thomas Cartvurihgt [sic]

As for that you be of judgment, that the Bishop may not excommunicate whom he listeth, without proof &c. and thereto cite a long sentence out of Augustin: it is well said, but wherefore serveth this well saying? do you think the church much beholding to you, for that which never any yet (the Popes Can onistes excepted which give him absolute power to throw out and take in whom he list) durst deny? here therefore, you run fairly, but out of the way altogether.

As for that yow be of iudgment, that the Bishop may not excommunicate whom he listeth, withowt profe &c. and therto cite a long sentence owt of Augustin: it is wel said, but wherfore serueth this wel saying? doe yow think the church much behoulding to yow, for that which neuer any yet (the Popes Cā onistes excepted which giue him absolute power to throw owt and take in whom he list) durst deny? here therfore, yow run fairely, but owt of the way altogither.

If I of the other side, should herein set down the judgment of ^aBucer ^bMartyr, ^cZuinglius, and other godly writers of our age, against the sole excommunication by the Bishop: it would require a book, by it self. But as in a thing clear and plain, I will not weary the reader. The two next divisions, as mere and oft repeated reproaches, I omit.

If I of the other side, should herein set down the iudgment of ^aBucer ^bMartyr, ^cZuinglius, and other godly writers of our age, against the sole excommunication by the Bishop: it would require a book, by it self. But as in a thing clear and plain, I wil not weary the reader. The two next diuisions, as meer and oft repeted reproches, I omit.