A19142:1012
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. All these considered, it will appear, that the Rej. had more will, then power, to maintain, that the silencing ⟨p. 201⟩of Preachers for our Ceremonies, is the preferring of orderly discreet Preachers, before those that are factious and exorbitant.
5. All these considered, it will appear, that the Rej. had more will, then power, to maintayne, that the silencing ⟨p. 201⟩of Preachers for our Ceremonies, is the praeferring of orderly discreet Preachers, before those that are factious and exorbitant.
6. After all this, out of Mr. Hy. his papers, it pleased the Def. to bring in some pieces out of the Abridgement: which for substance are such as diverse times have been handled before: and therefore need not much labour in this place.
6. After all this, out of Mr. Hy. his papiers, it pleased the Def. to bring in some peices out of the Abrigement: which for substance are suche as diverse times have been handled before: and therfor need not muche labor in this place.
The first is, that many people in our land, are known to hold the Sacraments not rightly and sufficiently administered or received without them. For the force of such an opinion in the multitude, many testimonies are alleged in the Abridgement, and applied unto this assertion, not in deed to prove the same simply, but to show what is the consequence of it. All these the Def. left out, and the Rej. had no mind to take them in, but chose rather to rest in this: they are no proofs of the assumption. It was added by the Repl. the opinion even of a few, may make some action unlawful, which the opinion of many other cannot make lawful. 1. Cot. 10.28. To avoid this, the Rejoinder had nothing material to say, before he had changed unlawful into simply unlawful.