A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

2. The first proof of our proposition was taken from the second Commandment: which the Def. ⟨p. 210⟩omitted in this place, and the Rejoinder will not have any man to take exception against the said, omission: but with what reason, let his reader judge.

2. The first proof of our proposition was taken from the second Commandement: which the Def. ⟨p. 210⟩omitted in this place, and the Rejoynder will not have any man to take exception against the sayd, omission: but with what reason, let his reader judge.

3. A second proof was, that Christ is the only teacher of his Church, and appointer of all means whereby we should be taught and admonished of any holy duty, and all Christs doctrine, with the means thereof, is perfectly contained in the holy Scripture. Here (saith the Rejoinder) the Def. forgot to tell, how absurd this collection is, Christ is the only authentic teacher of his Church etc. therefore they may be no means of teaching or admonishing unto duties, but such as be ordained as necessary. As if it were sufficient for the Def. or Rejoinder to tell us any thing as they please, how little ever it be to the purpose.

3. A second proof was, that Christ is the onely teacher of his Churche, and appointer of all meanes wherby we should be taught and admonished of any holy duty, and all Christs doctrine, with the meanes therof, is perfectly conteyned in the holy Scripture. Here (sayth the Rejoynder) the Def. forgot to tell, how absurd this collection is, Christ is the onely authentique teacher of his Churche etc. therfore they may be no meanes of teaching or admonishing unto duties, but suche as be ordeyned as necessarie. As if it were sufficient for the Def. or Rejoynder to tell us any thing as they please, how litle ever it be to the purpose.