A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Concerning the second and main point, the best way is, to set down D.R. his own words, which are these: Were it so, that the Popish Unction had another, either work, or meaning, with the Papists, then with the Jew, as after a sort, it hath, yet might the Ceremony be Jewish notwithstanding, as sacrificing of a lamb, to signify Christ already come. At the least S. Peter did constrain the Gentiles to Judaize (Gal. 2.12.) though he, and those Gentiles had another meaning, then that wherein that choice of meats was prescribed to the Jews. Adv. Hart. chap. 8. sect. 4.

Concerning the second and mayne poynt, the best way is, to set downe D.R. his owne wordes, which are these: Were it so, that the Popish Vnction had another, eyther worke, or meaning, with the Papists, then with the Iew, as after a sort, it hath, yet might the Ceremonie be Iewish notwithstanding, as sacrifizing of a lambe, to signifie Christ already come. At the least S. Peter did constrayne the Gentiles to Iudaize (Gal. 2.12.) though he, and those Gentiles had another meaning, then that wherin that choise of meates was praescribed to the Iews. Adv. Hart. chap. 8. sect. 4.

Thus far I had in my notes, out of the English edition but there is this more in the book, as I now find in the latin copy, not having the English at hand: your ⟨p. 219⟩rites in the very kind are Jewish or as the Jewish were. Now out of these last words I argue thus:¹ 1. If all umbratical rites be Judaical, and therefore unlawful, then all religious significant Ceremonies are Jewish and unlawful.

Thus farr I had in my notes, out of the English editiō but ther is this more in the booke, as I now finde in the latine copie, not having the English at hand: your