A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

The Rej. hereupon complaineth of manifest abusing and perverting D. Whitaker his words. And why so, I pray? 1. D. Whitaker spake of Divine figures, and the Repl. by corrupt translation maketh him to speak of Divine Ceremonies. As if D. Whitakers did understand by figures typical prefigurations of things to come only, in his dispute against the Papists, who by Bellarmine in that place confess, the Ceremonies of the old Testament were figures of the new Testament, and therefore when the thing it self is come should cease.¹

The Rej. heerupon complaineth of manifest abusing and perverting D. Whitaker his wordes. And why so, I pray? 1. D. Whitaker spake of Divine figures, and the Repl. by corrupt translation maketh him to speak of Divine Ceremonies. As if D. Whitakers did understand by •igures typicall praefigurations of thinges to come onely, in his di•pute against the Papists, whoe by Bellarmine in that place confesse, the Ceremonies of the old Testament were figures of the new Testament, and therefore when the thing it selfe is come should cease.¹

1. 1Ceremoniae veteris Testamenti figurae erant Testamenti novi, & proinde re ipsa praesente cessare debuerunt.

And what else could he understand, but significant Ceremonies? Doeth not the Rej. rather pervert D. Whitakers meaning, in making him to conclude against typical prefigurations, which Bellarmine did as well disclaim, as himself?

And what else could he understand, but significant Ceremonies? Doeth not the Rej. rather pervert D. Whitakers meaning, in making him to conclude against typicall praefigurations, which Bellarmine did as well disclaime, as himself?