A19142:126
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Come we to scan the particulars: The mischiefs, which he conceives to issue from Non-conformity are no less then Separation & profaneness. A heavy charge, I confess, but the best is, his reasons have not the wait of a rush.
Come vve to skanne the particulars: The mischeifs, vvhich he conceaues to issue from Non-conformity are no lesse then Seperation & prophanesse. A heavy charge, I confesse, but the best is, his reasons haue not the vvayt of a rush.
1. That of separation, p. 5. is supported upon so slender a ground, that he bewrays only his desire to have surpassed his power: therefore Rhetoricates in stead of reasoning. If these (saith he) be Idolatrous vvill worships; how can you? how dare you join with us, in those acts of Religion wherein these are used?
1. That of seperation, p. 5. is supported upon so slender a grounde, that he bevvrayes only his desire to haue surpassed his povver: therfore Rhetoricates in stead of reasoning. If these (sayth he) be Idolatrous vvill vvorshipps; hovv can you? hovv dare you ioyne vvith us, in those acts of Religion vvherein these are used?
Wherein he neither concludeth the question, because a man may refuse to join in such acts, without sepera[…] ⟨image 38⟩or utter condemning & renouncing all Church-communion: Neither doth he prove that, which he concludeth about joining in such acts, by any other argument •ut only by how can you, how dare you? To which • answer, we so can, & dare join in good acts, to which something participating of Idolatry is added, as Christ (our eacher) & his Apost: did join in the Jewesworship, unto which were added many superstitions, as unlawful, as ve had our Cerem: Nay I vvill add one thing further, hat, if D.B. be resolute in this point, i.e. that he must separate from all Churches, & Church actions, in which any superstition is exercised; then he must be one of the greatest Separatists in the world. For e holding error of judgement to be superstition, & those superstitious Brethren, that abstain for conscience sake rom things lawful, though only upon error in judgement: must upon the former ground separate from all those Churches in whose Religious acts, any thing in his judement lawful, is so abstained from; & much more if ny thing in his opinion unlawful, be put in practise: rom one of which faults, few or no Churches vvill be ound wholly free. Yet I would have another opinion f D. B. & think, that though he hold bowing to he altar, to be superstitious or Idolatrous, yet would