A19142:1498
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But that which moved me then and ••ill doeth move, and perhaps may justly move you, is namely; that, that is not to be d•n, which sh•ll confirm, what my conscience cannot allow of. 3. He telleth us plainly, •hat these Ceremonies are merae Papatus reliquiae, mere Popish relics condemned by Bullinger, and that he was, upon hope of their abolishing, onely tardior ad suadendum, loath to persuade unto suffering of deprivation for h•m. All these things are found in the places quoted by the Rejoinder. Let any indifferent reader guess by •hem, what was P. Martyrs judgement, in his free, and •nperplexed thoughts? Certainly it was not that which •he Defender and Rejoinder have rep•aesented unto us •or theirs; who accuse all those (beside o•her faults, many, and great) of superstition that refuse them as unlawful; they being Rites both orderly and also decent.
But that which mooved me then and ••ill doeth moove, and perhaps may justly moove you, is name•y; that, that is not to be d•n, which sh•ll confirme, what my •onscience cannot allow of. 3. He telleth us plainly, •hat these Ceremonies are merae Papatus reliquiae, meere Popish reliques condemned by Bullinger, and that he was, upon hope of their abolishing, onely tardior ad suadendum, loath to persuade unto suffering of deprivation for h•m. All these thinges are found in the places quoted by the Rejoynder. Let any indifferent reader gesse by •hem, what was P. Martyrs judgement, in his free, and •nperplexed thoughts? Certainly it was not that which he Defender and Rejoynder have repaesented unto us or theirs; whoe accuse all those (beside oher faults, many, and great) of uperstition that refuse them as unlawful; they being Rites both orderly and also decent.