A19142:1511
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
For how else could they more dislike them then Bishop Jewel himself, who held them (by the Rejoinder his confession) very inconvenient? 2. That B. Jewel would not grieve or prejudice those that were so minded, which our Defendant and Rejoinder labour to do with all the strength they have, and all the advantage they can catch hold on. Jewel durst not have called them Superstition brethren, factious and exorbitant men, &c. Moreover, two faults are committed by the Rejoinder, in reciting those words of Jewel: one, that he leaveth out the word padagogia, wherein he accused our Ceremonies as belonging to the infancy of the Jewish Church: and the other, that he took no knowledge of the following words, wherein he accuseth the Pope as the fountain of those evils, 1which gave cause and occasion of strife, and as it were thre• bones to the dogs. Where he maketh our Ceremonies relics of Popery, and cause of dissension. Add unto this, that in his Epistle to Q. Elizabeth, before the Defence of his Apology, he prayeth to God, that she might live to abolish all groves and high places, in England and it will appear how lawful our Ceremonies were in the judgement of that good learned man, as well in his life time, as at the hour of his death.
For how else could they more dislike them then Bishop Iewel himselfe, who held them (by the Rejoynder his confession) very inconvenient? 2. That B. Iewel would not grieve or prejudice those that were so minded, which our Defendant and Rejoynder labour to doe with all the strength they have, and all the advantage they can catch holde on. Iewel durst not have called them Superstition brethren, factious and exorbitant men, &c. Moreover, two faults are committed by the Rejoynder, in reciting those words of Iewel: one, that he leaveth out the word padagogia, wherein he accused our Ceremonies as belonging to the infancy of the Iewish Church: and the other, that he tooke no knowledge of the following words, wherein he accuseth the Pope as the fountaine of those evils, 1which gave cause and occasion of strife, and as it were thre• bones to the dogs. Where he maketh our Ceremonies reliques of Popery, and cause of dissention. Adde unto this, that in his Epistle to Q. Elizabeth, before the Defence of his Apollogie, he prayeth to God, that she might live to abolish all groves and high places, in England and it will appeare how lawfull our Ceremonies were in the judgement of that good learned man, as well in his life time, as at the houre of his death.