A19142:1508

A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Name: A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
Author: William Ames

A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part

William Ames 1576–1633Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633

[124], 156; 531, [13]; 64 p. : port. · 224k words · STC 555 · ESTC S100154

Title page: Internet Archive scan of the Early English Books microfilm (opens the Internet Archive in a new tab)

Part › Chapter 4 › SECT. 7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20. Councels, and Ancient… › Concerning Protestant Divines.

Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.

[ Earlier:1505–1520 of 1,758

:1505p. 467

His 3. and 4. answer is of different intentions, in the same materials. But this was in King Edwards days, by all professed: and yet M. Rogers and such could not see it sufficient. 5. M. Rogers would (saith the Rejoinder) allow the same things with some mark of difference. Not allow, but tolerate; not upon every mark of difference, but such as he knew would never be consented unto; that is, not at all.

His 3. and 4. answer is of different intentions, in the same materials. But this was in King Edwards days, by all professed: and yet M. Rogers and such could not see it sufficient. 5. M. Rogers would (sayth the Rejoynder) allow the same thinges with some marke of difference. Not allow, but tolerate; not upon every marke of difference, but such as he knew would never be consented unto; that is, not at all.

:1506p. 467–468¶10

10. Public injunctions were wont to forbid all Monuments of Superstition; and the Canons 1571. did forbid the grey Amice, and all other garments defiled with like superstition. Therefore (saith the Rejoinder 1.) •hey did not take our Ceremonies for such Monuments. But ⟨p. 468⟩that is nothing to the Proposition: Neither yet maketh it much to the Assumption of this Argument, what these or those did then take our Ceremonies to be. What they are in deed, we shall see in the Assumption. He 2. allegeth, that the Surplice was none of the Missal garments, as the Amice. But first Bellarmine, whom the Rejoinder made (of late) the Canon of Missal garments, maketh no more mention of the Amice, then of the Surplice. Durandus, or G. Minatensis, Rational. lib. 3. cap. 1. saith, In some things about the Altar they must use the Surplice. ¹Steven Mephem. cap Linteam. No clerk may be suffered about the Service of the Altar, unless he have the Surplice on at Mass. ²

[ Earlier passages Later passages ]

The book

Title as printed

Author

William Ames 1576–1633

Place

Amsterdam

Printer

the successors of Giles Thorp

Year

1633

Size

[124], 156; 531, [13]; 64 p. : port.

Words

224,419

Catalogue

STC 555 · ESTC S100154

Text

EEBO-TCP A19142

Passages

1,758

Sections

171

Title page

A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

SECT. 21. Concerning the Assumption of this fourth Argument: namely, that our Ceremonies are human devises, notoriously known to have been, and still to be abused unto Idolatry and Superstition, by the Papists, and are of no necessary use in the Church.

SECT. 21. Concerning the Assumption of this fourth Argument: namely, that our Ceremonies are human devises, notoriously knowne to have beene, and still to be abused unto Idolatrie and Superstition, by the Papists, and are of no necessarie use in the Church.

Reformers309

Puritans1,782

Westminster Assembly24

Evangelicals36

SECT. 21. Concerning the Assumption of this fourth Argument: namely, that our Ceremonies are human devises, notoriously known to have been, and still to be abused unto Idolatry and Superstition, by the Papists, and are of no necessary use in the Church.

SECT. 21. Concerning the Assumption of this fourth Argument: namely, that our Ceremonies are human devises, notoriously knowne to have beene, and still to be abused unto Idolatrie and Superstition, by the Papists, and are of no necessarie use in the Church.