A19142:295
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Again hence it follows, divine ceremonies as such, are parts of worship: every species as it is a species, is part of his genus: but divine ceremonies as such, are species of religious worship: whence that is false which the Rej. affirms in the seventh consectary:1 That actions in some consideration may be real acts of Divine worship, and as so, be no ceremonies. For its evident, he doth and must needs speak of acts Ceremoniously religious, and then beside the former argument, I would reason thus: ⟨p. 38⟩If a man, as he doth refer a religious action to another, doth worship God, then is it a species of worship even in that reference: but as he doth refer a religious action to another, he doth worship God: ergo, that action in that reference is a species of worship: And thus much his own words in the same consectary seem to me to evince: The outward elements and acts in respect of the inward things they do represent and exhibit are cerem. So the Rej. Consect. 7. P. 34. But I assume, God is worshipped by them, or they be parts of worship, in that very use, and therefore as ceremonies they are parts of worship: Hence lastly the vanity of the fifth consectary, is plainly discovered, as containing empty words without any worth of matter. For when its said: To acknowledge any thing, 2to be ordained a Cerem. by man, to be used in the worship of God, and yet to affirm the same to be a part of that worship to which it referreth, implies a contradiction: The answer is easy: It is confessed by all men, that Ceremo. are not part of that substantial worship, I say that particular worship, which they do accompany, and unto which they refer as none of the types in the old law, were either hearing, praying, believing, &c. and yet were real and proper ceremonious worship, in themselves considered, as being a contradistinct species thereof: So also the Sacraments, are no part of that particular inward worship whereunto they refer: namely, faith in God and his promises, and yet by signifying, sealing, according to Gods institution, they are true divine cere. and real true parts of worship in the General: So also our human Cere.
Againe hence it followes, divine ceremonies as such, are parts of worship: every species as it is a species, is part of his genus: but divine ceremonies as such, are species of religious worship: whence that is false which the Rej. affirmes in the seventh consectary: