A19142:544
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. For defence yet of this distinction of Ceremonies into dogmatical, and Ritual, or mere Ceremonial (though he confess it is not formal) the Rejoinder nameth all our Divines, but citeth only D.A. as distinguishing betwixt Doctrinal and Ceremonial points of religion. Which, if it be so, what maketh this for distinction of Ceremonies, into Dogmatical and Ritual, or merely Ceremonial? But let us view the places cited. The first is in Bel. Ever: tom. 1. pag. 66. Where it is said, that for the most part, the fathers by traditions, mean rites and Ceremonies, received without Scripture, concerning which, we dispute not, and they were too liberal, though when they judge out of Scripture, they plainly condemn unwritten traditions. What is here, that can help, the Rej.
3. For defence yet of this distinction of Ceremonies into dogmaticall, and Rituall, or meer Ceremoniall (though he confesse it is not formall) the Rejoynder nameth all our Divines, but citeth onely D.A. as distinguishing betwixt Doctrinall and Ceremoniall points of religion. Whiche, if it be so, what make•h this for distinction of Ceremonìes, into Dogmaticall and Rituall, or meerly Ceremoniall? But let us view the places cited. The first is in Bel. Ener: tom. 1. pag. 66. Where it is sayd, that for the most part, the fathers by traditions, meane rites and Ceremonies, receyved without Scripture, concerning which, wee dispute not, and they were too l•berall, though when they judge out of Scripture, they plainly condemne unwitten traditions. What is here, that can help, the Rej.
The fathers spake of Ceremonies, which neither Scripture, nor themselves, judging out of Scripture, did allow of: of them the question was not in that place, though in other places it is handled by the same author, in the same book, as De Pontifice, De Sacraementis, De cultu Sanctorum:
The fathers spake of Ceremonies, which neyther Scripture, nor themselves, judging out of Scripture, did allow of: of them the quaestion was not in that place, though in other places it is handled by the same author, in the same book, as De Pontifice, De Sacraementis, De cultu Sanctorum: