A19142:557
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The first wayward, false, irreligious, and gross untruth is, that the Def. should have dealt more plainly, if he had cited Bellarmine, and why (trow ye) is it so great a crime, for to say the Def. might have dealt more plainly? because (forsooth) no dealing could be more plain, then to set down the very words of Calvin, with the place, where they are to be found. Now be it so, yet it is not so heinous an offence to say some dealing, might be plainer then that which is most plain, but as the Secretaries and Proctors of our Prelates cour•s do in imitation of Criminal indictments (wherein always stand felonious etc.) aggravate every trifling accusation, and citation, especially those which concern a Bishop, as ungodly, irreligious, false etc. so must he that writeth, against any thing prejudicial to Praelats, secundum stylum Curiae, But the trueth is that any other mans words set down according to his meaning, is more plain dealing, then to set down Calvins, beside his intention.
The first wayward, false, irreligious, and grosse untruth is, that the Def. should have dealt more plainly, if he had cited Bellarmine, and why (trow ye) is it so great a crime, for to say the Def. might have dealt more plainly? because (forsooth) no dealing could be more plaine, then to set downe the very words of Calvin, with the place, where they are to be found. Now be it so, yet it is not so heynous an offence to say some dealing, might be playner then that which is most playne, but as the Secretaries and Proctors of our Prelats cour•s doe in imitation of Criminall inditements (wherin always stand felonious etc.) aggravate every trifling accusation, and citatiō, especially those which concerne a Bishop, as ungodly, irreligious, false etc. so must he that writeth, against any thing praejudiciall to Praelats, secundum stylum Curiae, But the trueth is that any other mans words set down according to his meaning, is more plaine dealing, then to set down Calvins, beside his intention.
The second way ward, false, irreligious, and gross untruth ⟨p. 13⟩