A19142:599
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
All this the Rejoinder knoweth: and yet he ceaseth not to beat the air, with endless repetitions of this imputation, gilded over with some variety of taunting phrases, that it may be the easier, swallowed by his unwary ⟨p. 30⟩reader. 2. It is secondly answered by the Def. that the ancient writers speak of doctrines, not of ceremonies. Whereunto the Repl. granting that to be true for the most part yet answereth, that the trueth of their sayings may be taken so generally, as to include all religious Ceremonies. Here the Rejoinder objecteth that limitation (for the most part) is only to abuse the simple, and that the ambiguous term of religious Ceremony, is a bush to hide I know not what in.
All this the Rejoynder knoweth: and yet he ceasseth not to beat the ayre, with endelesse repetitions of this imputation, guilded over with some varietie of tanting phrases, that it may be the easlier, swallowed by his unwary ⟨p. 30⟩reader. 2. It is secondly answered by the Def. that the ancient writers speak of doctrines, not of ceremonies. Wherunto the Repl. granting that to be true for the most part yet answereth, that the trueth of their sayings may be taken so generally, as to include all re•igious Ceremonies. Here the Rejoynder objecteth that limitation (for the most part) is onely to abuse the simple, and that the ambiguous terme of religious Ceremonie, is a bush to hide I know not what in.
Now for the former charge Compare here the Abridgement and Def. The later accusation of hiding-bush, etc. cannot otherwise be avoided (as it seemeth) except to avoid the same, we would upon every occasion, when we are to speak of the questioned kind of ceremonies, repeat the Rejoinder his beadroll of terms: double or treble significant, sacred by application, mutable, ambulatory, arbitrary, reductively sacramental, moral Ceremonies, immediate worship, in respect of means by virtue of some thing else, in respect of the manner, and reductively, in respect of the utmost end Divine worship.