A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Howsoever this doeth neither prove the reply none, nor yet non-sufficient. 3. He pronounceth it untrue, that the question here is not of mere Ceremonies and rites: which charge he groundeth upon the word specially in the service of God. But that word doeth show the speciality of our question to be about the matters of Gods service, or worship, such as significant Ceremonies are, and mere order is not. 4. He is styled a deceived man, that thinketh signification put upon a Ceremony, doeth necessarily make it more then a mere Ceremony.

Howsoever this doeth neyther prove the replie none, nor yet non-sufficient. 3. He pronounceth it untrue, that the question here is not of mere Ceremonies and rites: which charge he groundeth upon the word specially in the service of God. But that word doeth shew the specialitie of our question to be about the matters of Gods service, or worship, suche as significant Ceremonies are, and mere order is not. 4. Hee is styled a deceyved man, that thinketh signification put upon a Ceremonie, doeth necessarily make it more then a mere Ceremonie.

To which I answer, that if he that thinketh so, is a deceived man, then the Rejoinder doeth deceive, when in his Manuduction, pag. 33. and 39. he teacheth that special instituted signification, doeth make a Ceremony double or treble more then mere single rites of order.

To which I answer, that if he that thinketh so, is a deceyved man, then the Rejoynder doeth deceyve, when in his Manuduction, pag. 33. and 39. he teacheth that speciall instituted signification, doeth make a Ceremonie double or treble more then mere single rites of order.

2. The second quotation is out of D. Mortons Appeal, l. 2. c. 4. sect. 4. where is confessed, he speaketh of Ceremonies, but of Doctrinal only, such as sopping in of bread into the cup, etc.