A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Now for the former charge Compare here the Abridgement and Def. The later accusation of hiding-bush, etc. cannot otherwise be avoided (as it seemeth) except to avoid the same, we would upon every occasion, when we are to speak of the questioned kind of ceremonies, repeat the Rejoinder his beadroll of terms: double or treble significant, sacred by application, mutable, ambulatory, arbitrary, reductively sacramental, moral Ceremonies, immediate worship, in respect of means by virtue of some thing else, in respect of the manner, and reductively, in respect of the utmost end Divine worship.

Now for the former charge Compare here the Abrigment and Def. The later accusation of hiding-bush, etc. cannot otherwise be avoyded (as it seemeth) except to avoyd the same, we would upō every occasion, when we are to speak of the questioned kinde of ceremonies, repeat the Rejoynder his beadroul of termes: double or treble significant, sacred by application, mutable, ambalatorie, arbitrarie, reductively sacramentall, morall Ceremonies, immediate worship, in respect of meanes by vertue of some thing else, in respect of the manner, and reductively, in respect of the utmost ende Divine worship.

Wheresoever we observe not these terms partly of his own forging, since the Reply was written he may as well spy a bush over our head, as in this place. It is thirdly answered, that a general proposition may well be extended beyond one special conclusion to which it is upon occasion applied. To this (after that out of spleen (as I take it) he styleth it the mans stomach) the Rejoinder answereth that it may only be applied to other of the like kind. This therefore is only the difference, whether those Ceremonies which bear all those ⟨p. 31⟩titles even now rehearsed, be not of the like kind, or have not one common nature, with some of those things which the Rejoinder calleth substantial, and doctrinal, points: of which we have disputed before, and shall after, by Gods grace.

Whersoever we observe not these termes partly of his owne forging, since the Replie was written he may as well spie a bush over our head, as in this place. It is thirdly answered, that a generall proposition may well be extended beyond one speciall conclusion to which it is upon occasion applied. To this (after that out of splen (as I take it) he styleth it the mans stomacke) the Rejoynder answereth that it may onely be applyed to other of the like kinde. This therfor is onely the difference, whether those Ceremonies which bear all those