A19142:613
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Part › Chapter 1 › SECT. 15. Concerning Protestants arguing negatively from Scripture.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To which I answer, that if he that thinketh so, is a deceived man, then the Rejoinder doeth deceive, when in his Manuduction, pag. 33. and 39. he teacheth that special instituted signification, doeth make a Ceremony double or treble more then mere single rites of order.
To which I answer, that if he that thinketh so, is a deceyved man, then the Rejoynder doeth deceyve, when in his Manuduction, pag. 33. and 39. he teacheth that speciall instituted signification, doeth make a Ceremonie double or treble more then mere single rites of order.
2. The second quotation is out of D. Mortons Appeal, l. 2. c. 4. sect. 4. where is confessed, he speaketh of Ceremonies, but of Doctrinal only, such as sopping in of bread into the cup, etc.
2. The second quotation is out of D. Mortons Appeal, l. 2. c. 4. sect. 4. where is confessed, he speaketh of Ceremonies, but of Doctrinall onely, suche as sopping in of bread into the cup, etc.
Whereupon question was made, why this Ceremony should be accounted more doctrinal, or more unlawful, then the Cross in Baptism.
Wherupon question was made, why this Ceremonie should be accounted more doctrinall, or more unlawfull, then the Crosse in Baptisme.