A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

The fourth comparison was, that sopping was no new sign, but Crossing is. The Rejoinder opposeth that it had been an abomination to eat the Paschal lamb sodden, but the addition of sitting or leaning on couches (though a new sign added by them selves) was lawful etc. Of which speech, the first part is granted, viz. a sodden lamb had been an abomination: neither isa sopping communion excused. In the second, there is observable partiality, in that he calleth setting an addition to the Passover, and yet in the same answer, with the same breath, denieth the cross to be any addition unto Baptism. The ground of all is rotten, viz. that sitting was a religious significant Ceremony instituted by men.

The fourth comparison was, that sopping was no new signe, but Crossing is. The Rejoynder opposeth that it had been an abomination to eat the Pascall lambe sodden, but the addition of sitting or leaning on couches (though a new signe added by them selves) was lawfull etc. Of which speache, the first part is granted, viz. a sodden lambe had been an abomination: neyther isa sopping communion excused. In the second, ther is observable partiallitie, in that he calleth setting an addition to the Passeover, and yet in the same answer, with the same breath, denieth the crosse to be any addition unto Baptisme. The ground of all is rotten, viz. that sitting was a religious significant Ceremonie instituted by men.

These things considered, let any man judge what cause the Rejoinder had to talk in this place, of the Repl: his room-conscience, contentious spirit, smitten with giddiness, forsaken of wisdom?

These thinges considered, let any man judge what cause the Rejoynder had to talke in this place, of the Repl: his roome-conscience, contentious spirit, smitten with giddinisse, forsaken of wisdome?