A19142:681
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But this nothing at all argueth, that the Def. and the Repl. do not agree about the proposition, though they dissent about the place, as it is handled in the assumption. The Papists grant us, this proposition: No phrase is used by Christ, in those words: this is my body, but a Sacramental one. Yet because they deny the assumption: transubstantiating words, are not a Sacramental phrase, we undertake by argument to rescue this place out of their hands. So the Def. requiring no more, then order and Decency unto Edification, to be left unto the Churches liberty, for the establishing of our Ceremonies, doeth seem at least to grant, that all which is left to the Churches liberty is order and Decency unto edification, though he deny these to contain no more then mere circumstances, which is the assumption. Of Edification there is not mention made in the proposition, because that as an end, is out of question, and always included.
But this nothing at all argueth, that the Def. and the Repl. doe not agree about the proposition, though they dissent about the place, as it is handled in the assumtion. The Papists grant us, this proposition: No phraze is used by Christ, in those wordes: this is my body, but a Sacramentall one. Yet because they denie the assumtion: transubstantiating wordes, are not a Sacramentall phraze, we undertake by argument to rescue this place out of their handes. So the Def. requiring no more, then order and Decencie unto Edification, to be left unto the Churches libertie, for the establishing of our Ceremonies, doeth seem at least to grant, that all which is left to the Churches libertie is order and Decencie unto edification, though he denie these to conteyne no more then mere circumstances, which is the assumtion. Of Edification ther is not mention made in the proposition, because that as an ende, is out of question, and allways included.
6. Peter Martyr is cited, out of D. Whitaker, de Pontif. pag. 841.844. as agreeing with that which the Repl. would have. Here the Rej. enlargeth himself much for the sake (as he saith) of those that are unlatined.
6. Peter Martyr is cyted, out of D. Whitaker, de Pontif. pag. 841.844. as agreeing with that which the Repl. would have. Here the Rej. inlargeth himself much for the sake (as he sayth) of those that are unlatined.