A19142:685
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6. For more manifestation of the Repl. his vacuity of common honesty, the Rej. referreth us to the second testimony out of Junius, against Bell. cont. 3. l. 4. c. 16. n. 86.87. and cap. 17. n. 9.10.12.13.
6. For more manifestation of the Repl. his vacuitie of comon honestie, the Rej. referreth us to the second testimonie out of Iunius, against Bell. cōt. 3. l. 4. c. 16. n. 86.87. and cap. 17. n. 9.10.12.13.
Omitting therefore unnecessary repetition, let us hear the reasons of extraordinary dishonesty, 1. Junius ca. 16. n. 86.87. saith only first, that those humane laws are only necessary, in the Church, which tend to this, that all things may be done decently, and in order, 1. Cor. 14.40. Secondly, that these are improperly called laws in the Church, being more properly constitutions, or Canons.
Omitting therfore unnecessarie repetition, let us heare the reasons of extraordinarie dishonestie, 1. Iunius ca. 16. n. 86.87. sayth onely first, that those humane lawes are onely necessarie, in the Churche, which tende to this, that all thinges may be doen decently, and in order, 1. Cor. 14.40. Secondly, that these are improperly called lawes in the Churche, being more properly constitions, or Canons.
Now out of the first saying, the Repl. concluded, that Junius did judge the Apostle to leave no more to the Churches liberty, then to order Gods ordinances in decent manner: And out of the second, he inferred the same conclusion: because any Constitution, above ordering in decent manner that which before was enjoined, is properly a law. What extraordinary dishonesty is here? 2. Junu cap. 17. n. 9. saith only that to make new laws in divine things is to decline 1. c. in points of faith or necessary rules of sanctimony. But Junius maketh no mention at all, either of faith, or sanctimony, or necessity, Nor Bell. himself in that place. Neither is the question there handled, of points of faith or things absolutely necessary to sanctimony. All double treble Ceremonies reductively Sacramental, and worship, are by the Rej. his own dictates double sacred: and that is it which Junius meaneth by divine. 3. Bell saith that the addition forbidden