A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Sacred things applied to Civill business, do not therefore become Civill, for who will say, that Prayer, at the beginning of a Parliament, is a Civill act, though it were used in the Upper, and lower house, and applied to that Civill meeting, as it ought to be? And why then shall application of Civill decency unto ⟨p. 74⟩Sacred business, make it alter the nature or name of it?

Sacred thinges applied to Civill buissinesse, doe not therfore become Civill, for who will say, that Prayer, at the beginning of a Parliament, is a Civill act, though it were used in the Vpper, and lower house, and applied to that Civill meeting, as it ought to be? And why then shall application of Civill decencie unto ⟨p. 74⟩Sacred buisinesse, make it alter the nature or name of it?

His 3. answer is, that all means of worship are not worship. But he knew well enough, that this was meant of proper means of worship.

His 3. answer is, that all meanes of worship are not worship. But he knew well enough, that this was meant of proper means of worship.

His fourth is, that ordering and manner of disposing, is ill divided from comeliness. Neither did the Repl. intend so to divide, but rather to conjoin them, understanding by that manner of disposing, comeliness. But if the Rejoinder had not cached up some show of confounding comeliness with order, which was not intended by the Repl. he had been in this argument wholly at a loss.