A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Pauls plain cloak was more suitable then the richest Cope in all Rome. If Order requireth outward shows of dignity, then Rome, which is a confused Babel, may be to all Churches an imitable example of religious order, for the Council of Trent sess. 22. professeth, their mass Ceremonies to be invented. That the Majesty of such a Sacrifice might be set out.

Pauls plaine cloak was more suitable then the richest Coap in all Rome. If Order requireth outward shews of dignitie, then Rome, which is a confused Babel, may be to all Churches an imitable exāple of religious order, for the Councel of Trent sess. 22. professeth, their masse Ceremonies to be invented. That the Majesty of such a Sacrifice might be set out.

¹12. To show further that Order requireth not such Ceremony as ours, the notation of the word was brought in, signifying no such thing. Now the Rejoinder granteth that originally the word doeth not contain within the compass of it, such kind of Ceremonies, though by usage it may. Which is very true: but helpeth not, except the Def. or Rejoinder whose principal Argument is taken from this place, and only retorted by us, can prove, that in this place, the word order is extended beyond his original signification. He will not therefore stand with us, about the signification of the word in this place: let order (saith he) in this place signify no more then placing. But he maketh his retreat to the word Comeliness: asking if comeliness be nothing? I answer yes, it is some thing: but the Replier did not insist in that word, because he ⟨p. 77⟩took the force of the Def. his Argument from this place principally to lie upon order.

¹12. To shew further that Order requireth not suche Ceremonie as ours, the notation of the word was brought in, signifying no suche thing. Now the Rejoynder granteth that originally the word doeth not conteyne within the compasse of it, suche kinde of Ceremonies, though by usage it may. Which is very true: but helpeth not, except the Def. or Rejoynder whose principall Argument is taken from this place, and onely retorted by us, can prove, that in this place, the word order is extended beyond his originall signification. He will not therfore stand with us, about the signification of the word in this place: let order (sayth he) in this place signifie no more then placing. But he maketh his retrait to the word Comelinesse: asking if comelinesse be nothing? I answer yes, it is some thing: but the Replier did not insist in that word, because he