A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

2. The argument was thus formed by the Repl. Those Ceremonies, which have the kind, nature, and definition of worship belonging to them, so that they want nothing but a right author, to make them true worship, those are in their imposition and use, worship, and for want •f a right author, false worship. But our Ceremonies are •uche. Ergo. Here the Rejoinder first complaineth again, that the term Real. is left out of the assumption, into which it was put by the Def. But 1. who gave licence to the Def. for to put new terms into our arguments? It is not true, that he put any such term into the assumption, but only mentioned in the title of this section. 3. Except such a ridiculous sense be put upon this term Real, as was even now observed, of proper essential, necessary, it may be understood both in the proposition, and in the the assumption also. For if the kind, nature, and definition of worship do agree to our Ceremonies then they are not only verbal worship, in some fashion of speech (as the Rejoinder distinguisheth, but real worship.

2. The argument was thus formed by the Repl. Those Ceremonies, which have the kinde, nature, and definition of worship belonging to them, so that they want nothing but a right author, to make them true worship, those are in their imposition and use, worship, and for want •f a right author, false worship. But our Ceremonies are •uche. Ergo. Here the Rejoynder first complayneth againe, that the terme Reall. is left out of the assumtion, into which it was put by the Def. But 1. who gave licence to the Def. for to put new termes into our arguments? It is not true, that he put any suche terme into the assumtion, but onely mentioned in the title of this section. 3. Except suche a ridiculos sense be put upon this terme Reall, as was even now observed, of prop•r essentiall, ne•essarie, it may be understood both in the proposition, and in the the assumtion also. For if the kinde, nature, and d•finition of worship doe agree to our Ceremonies then they are not onely verball worship, in some fashion of speache (as the Rejoynder distinguisheth, but reall worship.