A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Otherwise, I see not what more real worship there was in Jacobs place of sacrificing at Bethel, upon Gods special determination, Gen. 35. then in Abraham's sacrificing at Hebron, without any such special determination of God, Gen. 13.

Otherwise, I see not what more reall worship ther was in Iacobs place of sacrifizing at Bethel, upon Gods speciall determination, Gen. 35. then in Abrahams sacrifizing at Hebron, without any suche speciall determination of God, Gen. 13.

When all other Essays fail, the Repl. himself is brought in as guilty of contradiction, because he affirmeth these two things: the institution of God doeth distinguish true worship from false: and yet it doeth not alter the common nature of worship. For (saith the Rejoinder) it is as if one should say: the reasonable soul doeth distinguish man from creatures that have not understanding: and yet it doeth not alter the common nature of the creature. But the Repl. had answered this before, if the Rejoinder would have attended unto his words, as they are by himself set down, pag. 189. alter the common nature of worship, that is, make that worship, which otherwise, being used to the same end, and in the same manner, without Gods institution, were no worship at all. In which words he plainly expressed, that by altering the common nature of worship, he meant nothing less, than making true worship of false, but only creating or making the common essential nature of worship. And certain it is, that the reasonable soul (as it is reasonable) doeth not make the common ⟨p. 171⟩essential nature of a living creature, for then there could be no living creature, without a reasonable soul as the Rejoinder affirmeth, there can be no proper worship, without Gods appointment.