A19563:630
An answerAn aunsvvere
An answer by the Reverend Father in God Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England and metropolitan, unto a crafty and sophistical cavillation, devised by Stephen Gardiner Doctor of Law, late Bishop of Winchester against the true and godly doctrine of the most holy sacrament, of the body and blood of our saviour Jesus Christ Wherein is also, as occasion serveth, answered such places of the book of Doct. Richard Smith, as may seem any thing worthy the answering. Here is also the true copy of the book written, and in open court delivered, by D. Stephen Gardiner ...An aunsvvere by the Reuerend Father in God Thomas Archbyshop of Canterbury, primate of all England and metropolitane, vnto a craftie and sophisticall cauillation, deuised by Stephen Gardiner Doctour of Law, late Byshop of Winchester agaynst the true and godly doctrine of the most holy sacrament, of the body and bloud of our sauiour Iesu Christ Wherein is also, as occasion serueth, aunswered such places of the booke of Doct. Richard Smith, as may seeme any thyng worthy the aunsweryng. Here is also the true copy of the booke written, and in open court deliuered, by D. Stephen Gardiner ...
London: printed by John Daye, 1580London: printed by Iohn Daye, 1580
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
After the differences followeth the 3.4.5. and 6. chapters of my book which you bind as it were all together in one fardel, and cast them quite away, by the figure which you call rejection, not answering one word to ⟨p. 95⟩any Scripture, or old writer, which I have there alleged for the defence of the truth. But because the Reader may see the matter plainly before his eyes, I shall hear rehearse my words again, and join thereto your answer. My words be these.
After the differences followeth the 3.4.5. and 6. chapters of my book which you binde as it were all together in one fardel, and cast them quite away, by the figure which you call reiection, not answering one word to ⟨p. 95⟩any Scripture, or olde wryter, which I haue there alleadged for the defence of the truth. But because the Reader may see the matter plainly before his eyes, I shall heare rehearse my words againe, and ioyne thereto your answere. My wordes be these.
Now to return to the principal matter, lest it might be thought a new devise of us, that Christ, as concerning his body and his human nature, is in heaven and not in earth: therefore by Gods grace it shall be evidently proved, that this is no new devised matter, but that it was ever the old faith of the catholic Church, until the Papists invented a new faith, that Christ really, corporally,1 naturally, and sensibly is here still with us in earth, shut up in a box or within the compass of bread and wine.
Now to returne to the principall matter, lest it might be thought a new deuise of vs, that Christ, as concerning his body and his humaine nature, is in heauen and not in earth: therefore by Gods grace it shalbe euidently proued, that this is no new deuised matter, but that it was euer the olde fayth of the catholicke Church, vntill the Papistes inuented a new fayth, that Christ really, corporally,