A19884:629
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his writings. By John Davenport BD.An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his wrightings. By Iohn Davenporte BD.
Rotterdam: printed by Isaac van Waesberghe, 1636Rotterdam: printed by Isaack van Waesberghe, 1636
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Pretence. 1 First, pretence.] None will present their children to be baptised but Christians?
Ans. 1. It is a conclusion amongst the schoolemen that,1 Non sunt infidelium pueri, invitis parentibus, baptisandi. Children of infidels are not to be baptised without their parents consent. Wherein they suppose that such a case is possible. If so, why may not the child of a Jew, or Moore, or Indian be brought by some one or other to baptism, without the parents consent or knowledge? And the manner of Amsterdam is to refuse none that are presented, by whomsoever, whereby it is very possible, that some infants may be baptised, whose parents are no Christians, though the parents would not have them presented.
Ans. 1. It is a conclusion amongst the schoolemen that,1