A19884:720
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his writings. By John Davenport BD.An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his wrightings. By Iohn Davenporte BD.
Rotterdam: printed by Isaac van Waesberghe, 1636Rotterdam: printed by Isaack van Waesberghe, 1636
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
His Answer to the 19. Section examined containing certain Acts of the Classis after that my dissent and refusal of the call was known.
His Answer to the 19. Section examined containing certaine Acts of the Classis after that my dissent and refusall of the call was knowne.
IN this Section we have the story of passages concerning this business, in three Classes, and with the Magistrates. But, before I examine them, it may be demanded, why this matter was brought into the Classis, seeing I had in the Consistory declared my not accepting the call, which was offered me, upon those terms? was it because the Consistory had not power to give me a convenient time for informing my self concerning the orders & customs of the Dutch Church, by consent amongst themselves, without seeking to the Classis? But I come to the particulars.
IN this Section we have the story of passages concerning this buisenes, in three Classes, and with the Magistrates. But, before I examine them, it may be demanded, why this matter was brought into the Classis, seing I had in the Consistory declared my not accepting the call, which was offered me, upon those termes? was it because the Consistory had not power to give me a convenient time for informing my selfe concerning the orders & customs of the Dutch Church, by consent amongst themselves, without seeking to the Classis? But I come to the particulars.
Concerning the first Classical meeting four things are reported. 1. their dislike of my change. 2.