A26864:104
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 2.
R. B. 1. IT is a strange phrase to call any act of faith [An act of Justification.] If you speak properly, you must mean it efficienter vel constitutivè: either that some act of faith is an act of Justification, as the efficient (but that's far ⟨p. 11⟩from truth, to believe and to justify differ) or else that it is an act constituting Justification: But that is as far from truth; for then Credere should be Justificari. If you speak improperly, you must mean, either [An act effecting Justification] as it seems you do; which is unsound, as well as improper: or else [An act which is the Condition of Justification] which is sound, though improper.
R. B. 1. IT is a strange phrase to call any act of faith [An act of Justification.] If you speak properly, you must mean it efficienter vel constitutivè: either that some act of faith is an act of Justification, as the efficient (but thats farre ⟨p. 11⟩from truth, to beleeve and to justifie differ) or else that it is an act constituting Justification: But that is as far from truth; for then Credere should be Justificari. If you speak improperly, you must mean, either [An act effecting Justification] as it seems you do; which is unsound, as well as improper: or else [An act which is the Condition of Justification] which is sound, though improper.