A26864:145
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 7.
Mr Bl. The work about which faith is employed, is not an absolute, but a relative work: a work of God towards man: not without the actual concurrence of man: such in which neither God nor man are sole efficients; nor any act of God or man can be sole instruments; but there must be a mutual concurrence of both.
Mr Bl. THe work about which faith is imploied, is not an absolute, but a relative work: a work of God towards man: not without the actual concurrence of man: such in which neither God nor man are sole efficients; nor any act of God or man can be sole instruments; but there must be a mutual concurrence of both.
§. 7.
R. B. A Dangerous Doctrine, in my Judgement, to be so nakedly affirmed: No doubt but Justification is a Relative change: and it is past Controversy, that it is not without the actual concurrence of man: for he must perform the Condition, on which God will justify him: But that God is not the sole Efficient, nor any *Act of God, the sole Instrument, I durst not have affirmed without proof: and much less have undertaken to prove.