A26864:149
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 8.
Mr Bl. This must needs be granted, unless we will bring in D r Crisps passive recipiency of Christ: Christs abode in man without man, in spite of man, and suppose him to be justified in unbelief.
Mr Bl. THis must needs be granted, unless we will bring in D r Crispes passive recipiency of Christ: Christs abode in man without man, in spite of man, and suppose him to be justified in unbelief.
§. 8.
R. B. This is very naked asserting. Why did you not show some reason of this ill consequence? Its past my reach to see the least. 2. Why do you still confound Christs real abode in us by his Spirit, with the relation we have upon Justification? when even now you affirmed, it was a relative work (as you call it) I pray, by the next show us more clearly, how these absurdities follow that doctrine which affirmeth, That God is the sole Efficient cause of our Justification, but having made mans Belief and Consent the Condition (whose nature is to suspend the effect, till performed) he will not justify us till we first believe and consent. This is my Doctrine plainly.
R. B. THis is very naked asserting. Why did you not shew some reason of this ill consequence? Its past my reach to see the least. 2. Why do you still confound Christs real abode in us by his Spirit, with the relation we have upon Justification? when even now you affirmed, it was a relative work (as you call it) I pray, by the next shew us more clearly, how these absurdities follow that doctrine which affirmeth, That God is the sole Efficient cause of our Justification, but having made mans Belief and Consent the Condition (whose nature is to suspend the effect, till performed) he will not justifie us till we first believe and consent. This is my Doctrine plainly.