A26864:323
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. He that is guilty of the breach of all Gods Laws, is not denominated Righteous (nisi aequivocè) by that Law: But we break all Gods Laws: Therefore. Yea he that offendeth in one is guilty of all. Read Brochmond in Jac. 2.10. and Jacob. Laurentius, and Paulus Burgensis (in Lyra) on the same Text. Vid. & Placaeum in Thesib. Salmuriens. Vol. 1. pag. 29. §. 13, &c. Wotton de Reconcil. Part. 2. l. 1. c. 5. n. 16. Twiss. Vindic. Grat. li. 2. part. 1. c. 15. pag. (vol. minore) 214. col. 2. See whether yours or mine be the Protestants doctrine. Here, if ever, its true, that Bonum est ex causis integris.
4. He that is guilty of the breach of all Gods Laws, is not denominated Righteous (nisi aequivocè) by that Law: But we break all Gods Laws: Therefore. Yea he that offendeth in one is guilty of all. Reade Brochmond in Jac. 2.10. and Jacob. Laurentius, and Paulus Burgensis (in Lyra) on the same Text. Vid. & Placaeum in Thesib. Salmuriens. Vol. 1. pag. 29. §. 13, &c. Wotton de Reconcil. Part. 2. l. 1. c. 5. n. 16. Twiss. Vindic. Grat. li. 2. part. 1. c. 15. pag. (vol. minore) 214. col. 2. See whether yours or mine be the Protestants doctrine. Here, if ever, its true, that Bonum est ex causis integris.
5. If imperfect works are all sins or sinful, then they are not our Righteousness according to the Law of works. (For it justifieth no man for his sins.) But the former is true: Therefore the later. I doubt not but you know the state of the Controversy on this point, between us and the Papists.
5. If imperfect works are all sinnes or sinfull, then they are not our Righteousness according to the Law of works. (For it justifieth no man for his sins.) But the former is true: Therefore the later. I doubt not but you know the state of the Controversie on this point, between us and the Papists.