A26864:339
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 35.
Mr. Bl. AS an Image carrying an imperfect resemblance of its Sampler, is an Image; so conformity imperfectly answering the Rule, is conformity likewise.
Mr. Bl. AS an Image carrying an imperfect resemblance of its Samplar, is an Image; so conformity imperfectly answering the Rule, is conformity likewise.
§. 35.
R.B. 1. Either that Image is like the Sampler (as you call it) in some parts and unlike in others, or else it is like in no part, but near to like. If the later, then it is but near to a true Image of that thing, and not one indeed. If the former, then it is nothing to our case. 1. Because it is Justitia universalis, and not particularis, that according to the Law of works must denominate the person righteous, and not-condemnable. 2. Because indeed no one word, action, or thought of ours is truly conform to the Law of works.
R.B. 1. EIther that Image is like the Samplar (as you call it) in some parts and unlike in others, or else it is like in no part, but near to like. If the later, then it is but near to a true Image of that thing, and not one indeed. If the former, then it is nothing to our case. 1. Because it is Justitia universalis, and not particularis, that according to the Law of works must denominate the person righteous, and not-condemnable. 2. Because indeed no one word, action, or thought of ours is truly conform to the Law of works.