A26864:399
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
He saith, [The Covenant is the Ground of Baptism, otherwise Church-membership would evince no Title, &c.] Repl. 1. I take Gods precept to be the Ground of Baptism, as it is officium a Duty, both as to the baptizer and the baptized: and his Promise, or his Covenant Grant, to be the Ground of mens Right to it, as it is a Benefit given directly by God: and their own true consent, faith or covenanting (which with me are all one, for all that you say against it) to be the condition of that Right. But then I think that in foro Ecclesiae a dissembler may claim that Right which strictly he hath not, and we must grant him what he claims when he brings a Probable ground of his claim: And in that it is Ministers duty to Baptize such, they may indirectly, and quoad Ecclesiam be said to have Right to be Baptized. I say Indirectly, yea and improperly: for it is not the result of Gods Covenant Grant to them; but of his precept to his Ministers, and his Instructions, whom they ought to Baptize.
He saith, [The Covenant is the Ground of Baptism, otheewise Church-membership would evince no Title, &c.] Repl. 1. I take Gods precept to be the Ground of Baptism, as it is officium a Duty, both as to the baptizer and the baptized: and his Promise, or his Covenant Grant, to be the Ground of mens Right to it, as it is a Benefit given directly by God: and their own true consent, faith or covenanting (which with me are all one, for all that you say against it) to be the condition of that Right. But then I think that in foro Ecclesiae a dissembler may claim that Right which strictly he hath not, and we must grant him what he claims when he brings a Probable ground of his claim: And in that it is Ministers duty to Baptize such, they may indirectly, and quoad Ecclesiam be said to have Right to be Baptized. I say Indirectly, yea and improperly: for it is not the result of Gods Covenant Grant to them; but of his precept to his Ministers, and his Instructions, whom they ought to Baptize.
2. I argued from Right of admission to Church-membership, with Mr. T. and that Right I take the heart-covenant (of Parent or parties themselves) to be the condition of, as to the Invisible Church-state, and the Profession of that Covenant, not alone, but joined with it, to be the condition of true Right before God to Visible-membership; though men are but to use him as one that hath true Right, who by an hypocritical profession seems to have Right.