A26864:502
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I need not cite Scriptures to prove that the baptized are called by the Apostles, Believers, Saints, Disciples, Christians: Mr. Blake hath done it already, chap. 28. Now who knows not that salvation is made the Portion of Believers, Saints, Disciples? But what, is it another sort of them? or doth Scripture use to divide Saints, as the Genus into two Species? Not that I know of; It is but as an aequivocum in sua aequivocata: The Apostles naming men according to their appearance and Profession, and calling them such as they probably might be. ⟨p. 100⟩Why else should they call them such, had not they seemed to be such, and professed it? The names therefore do not primarily agree to these as a true Species of Believers, Saints, Disciples, Christians; but secondarily, as the name of a man to a Corps, or as the name of a Habit to a disposition, by translation, or Analogy.
I need not cite Scriptures to prove that the baptized are called by the Apostles, Believers, Saints, Disciples, Christians: Mr. Blake hath done it already, chap. 28. Now who knows not that salvation is made the Portion of Believers, Saints, Disciples? But what, is it another sort of them? or doth Scripture use to divide Saints, as the Genus into two Species? Not that I know of; It is but as an aequivocum in sua aequivocata: The Apostles naming men according to their appearance and Profession, and calling them such as they probably might be. ⟨p. 100⟩Why else should they call them such, had not they seemed to be such, and professed it? The names therefore do not primarily agree to these as a true Species of Believers, Saints, Disciples, Christians; but secondarily, as the name of a man to a Corps, or as the name of a Habit to a disposition, by translation, or Analogie.
But to put the matter beyond doubt, I wish Mr. Bl. to consider, that its not only these forementioned titles, but even the rest which he will acknowledge proper to the Regenerate, which are given by the Apostles generally to the baptized. Adoption is ascribed to them,