ibid
Mr Bl's Absurdities supposed to follow the restraint of the Covenant to the Elect, considered, §. 41. pag. 80
Our own Covenanting is the principal part of the Condition of Gods promise or Covenant of Grace, §. 41. pag. 81
Whether I make the Seal of Baptism, and of the Spirit, to be of equal latitude, §. 42. pag. 84
Mr. Bl's dangerous argument, answered [The great Condition to which Baptism engageth, is not a prerequisite in Baptism: But Justifying Faith is such: Therefore] §. 43. ibid
More of Mr. Bl's Arguments answered, §. 44, & 45. pag. 86
My Arguments Vindicated from Mr. Bl's Exception, §. 46. to 52. pag. 88
26 Arguments to prove, that it is Justifying faith which God requires of them that come to Baptism, and that Mr. Bl's doctrine in this is unsound and unsafe, §. 52. pag. 94
Of Mr. Bl's Controversy with Mr. Firmin, §. 53. pag. 107
My asserting of the Absolute promise of the first Grace, vindicated, §. 55 pag. 108
Whether our Faith and Repentance be Gods works, §. 55. pag. 109
What Life was promised to Adam in the first Covenant, §. 56. pag. 111
Of the Death threatened by the first Covenant, §. 57. pag. 112
Whether the Death of the body by separation of the soul were determinately threatened, §. 58. pag. 113
Of the Law as made to Christ, §. 59. pag. 115
Whether the Sacrament seal the Conditional promise Absolutely? or the ⟨image 19⟩Conclusion [I am Justified and shall be saved] Conditionally, §. 60, 61, 62, 63. pag. 115
The Nature of sealing opened, §. 64. pag. 118
20 Propositions showing how God sealeth, §. 64. pag. 119
That the minor being sealed, the Conclusion is not eo nomine sealed, as Mr. Bl. affirmeth, §. 65. pag. 123
How Sacraments seal with particular Application, §. 67. pag. 125
Mr. Bl's doctrine untrue, that [If the Conclusion be not sealed, then no Proposition is sealed] §. 68. pag. 126
Whether it be Virtually written in Scripture that Mr. Bl. is Justified, §. 69. pag. 126
More about Conditional sealing, §. 70, 71. pag. 128
Whether it is de fide that Mr. Bl. is Justified, §. 72, 73, 74. pag. 129
In what sense we deny that Conclusion to be de fide, §. 75. pag. 133
That Divine Faith hath Evidence, as well as Certainty. Rob. Baronius and Rada's words to the contrary, examined, §. 75. pag. 134
The difference between Mr. Bl. and me contracted, and a plain cogent Argument added, to prove, that the Conclusion fore-mentioned is not sealed, §. 76. pag.
ibid
Mr Bl's Absurdities supposed to follow the restraint of the Covenant to the Elect, considered, §. 41. pag. 80
Our own Covenanting is the principal part of the Condition of Gods promise or Covenant of Grace, §. 41. pag. 81
Whether I make the Seal of Baptism, and of the Spirit, to be of equal latitude, §. 42. pag. 84
Mr. Bl's dangerous argument, answered [The great Condition to which Baptism engageth, is not a prerequisite in Baptism: But Justifying Faith is such: Therefore] §. 43. ibid
More of Mr. Bl's Arguments answered, §. 44, & 45. pag. 86
My Arguments Vindicated from Mr. Bl's Exception, §. 46. to 52. pag. 88
26 Arguments to prove, that it is Justifying faith which God requires of them that come to Baptism, and that Mr. Bl's doctrine in this is unsound and unsafe, §. 52. pag. 94
Of Mr. Bl's Controversie with Mr. Firmin, §. 53. pag. 107
My asserting of the Absolute promise of the first Grace, vindicated, §. 55 pag. 108
Whether our Faith and Repentance be Gods works, §. 55. pag. 109
What Life was promised to Adam in the first Covenant, §. 56. pag. 111
Of the Death threatned by the first Covenant, §. 57. pag. 112
Whether the Death of the body by separation of the soul were determinately threatned, §. 58. pag. 113
Of the Law as made to Christ, §. 59. pag. 115
Whether the Sacrament seal the Conditional promise Absolutely? or the ⟨image 19⟩Conclusion [I am Justified and shall be saved] Conditionally, §. 60, 61, 62, 63. pag. 115
The Nature of sealing opened, §. 64. pag. 118
20 Propositions shewing how God sealeth, §. 64. pag. 119
That the minor being sealed, the Conclusion is not eo nomine sealed, as Mr. Bl. affirmeth, §. 65. pag. 123
How Sacraments seal with particular Application, §. 67. pag. 125
Mr. Bl's doctrine untrue, that [If the Conclusion be not sealed, then no Proposition is sealed] §. 68. pag. 126
Whether it be Virtually written in Scripture that Mr. Bl. is Justified, §. 69. pag. 126
More about Condi•ional sealing, §. 70, 71. pag. 128
Whether it is de fide that Mr. Bl. is Justified, §. 72, 73, 74. pag. 129
In what sense we deny that Conclusion to be de fide, §. 75. pag. 133
That Divine Faith hath Evidence, as well as Certainty. Rob. Baronius and Rada's words to the contrary, examined, §. 75. pag. 134
The difference between Mr. Bl. and me contracted, and a plain •ogent Argument added, to prove, that the Conclusion fore-mentioned is not sealed, §. 76. pag.
