A26864:627
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. The Sacraments may confirm your faith in Christ as given to you, otherwise then by sealing, viz. as they are signs for Remembrance, Excitation to sense and lively apprehensions of Gods Donation, and as they are signs instrumental in sole Conveyance of the benefit Given, as a twig and a turf, and a Key in giving possession, and the words and actions of matrimonial solemnization or Contract.
3. The Sacraments may confirme your faith in Christ as given to you, otherwise then by sealing, viz. as they are signs for Remembrance, Excitation to sense and lively apprehensions of Gods Donation, and as they are signs instrumental in sole Conveyance of the benefit Given, as a twig and a turfe, and a Key in giving possession, and the words and actions of matrimonial solemnization or Contract.
4. It is new Logic to my understanding, that the minor being sealed, the Conclusion eo nomine is sealed: The minor of many an Argument may be true, and the conclusion false. And therefore when the case so falls out, that both minor and conclusion are true, or sealed, it is not eo nomine, because the minor is true, that the Conclusion is so, (or is sealed, eo nomine because the minor is so) but because both major and minor are so, and not then neither, but upon supposition that the Syllogism be sound.
4. It is new Logick to my understanding, that the minor being sealed, the Conclusion eo nomine is sealed: The minor of many an Argument may be true, and the conclusion false. And therefore when the case so falls out, that both minor and conclusion are true, or sealed, it is not eo nomine, because the minor is true, that the Conclusion is so, (or is sealed, eo nomine because the minor is so) but because both major and minor are so, and not then neither, but upon supposition that the Syllogism be sound.