A26864:648
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 70.
R. B. 1. BY Rightly, I meant, having Right to it, and that only in foro Ecclesiae, and not Rectè. But I confess I should have plainlyer expressed my meaning. 2. •hether you here contradict not your Doctrine of Baptismal Faith, where you suppose Justifying Faith to be the thing promised by us in Baptism, and therefore not prerequisite in it, I leave you to judge, and resolve as by your explication.
R. B. 1. BY Rightly, I meant, having Right to it, and that only in foro Ecclesiae, and not Rectè. But I confess I should have plainlyer exprest my meaning. 2. •hether you here contradict not your Doctrine of Baptismal Faith, where you suppose Justifying Faith to be the thing promised by us in Baptism, and therefore not prerequisite in it, I leave you to judge, and resolve as by your explication.
§. 71.
Mr. Bl. And no man can groundedly administer the Sacrament to any but himself, because he can be certain of no mans Justification and Salvation; Upon the same terms that he knows any man may be saved, upon the same he may give him the Sacrament sealing this salvation. This argument as we heard before, is Bellarmines, and concludes indeed against Absolute seals in the Sacrament, but not against Conditional sealing, as is confessed by Protestant Divines.