A26864:70
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. I distinguish still between constitutive Justification or Remission by the Gospel grant or Covenant, called by most Justificatio Juris, and Justification per sententiam Judicis. 2. I distinguish between constitutive Legal Justification as begun, and as continued or consummate. 3. Between the Physical operation of Christ and his Benefits on the intellect of the Believer per modum objecti apprehensi, as an intelligible species; and the moral conveyance of Right to Christ and his Benefits, which is by an act of Law or Covenant-donation. 4. Between these two questions, What justifieth ex parte Christi? and What justifieth, or is required to our Justification ex parte peccatoris? 5. Between the true efficient causes of our Justification, and the mere condition, sine qua non, & cum quâ. 6. Between Christs Meriting mans Justification, and his actual justifying him, by constitution or sentence.
1. I distinguish still between constitutive Justification or Remission by the Gospel grant or Covenant, called by most Justificatio Juris, and Justification per sententiam Judicis. 2. I distinguish between constitutive Legal Justification as begun, and as continued or consummate. 3. Between the Physical operation of Christ and his Benefits on the intellect of the Beleever per modum objecti apprehensi, as an intelligible species; and the moral conveyance of Right to Christ and his Benefits, which is by an act of Law or Covenant-donation. 4. Between these two questions, What justifieth ex parte Christi? and What justifieth, or is required to our Justification ex parte peccatoris? 5. Between the true efficient causes of our Justification, and the meer condition, sine qua non, & cum quâ. 6. Between Christs Meriting mans Justification, and his actual justifying him, by constitution or sentence.
Hereupon I will lay down what I maintain in these Propositions, which (some of them) shall speak further then the present Point in Question, for a preparation to what followeth.